Discussion Papers

C5 - Wettbewerbspolitik als Steuerung von Wettbewerbsprozessen

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

366

Robert C. Schmidt, Roland Strausz
The Timing of Climate Agreements under Multiple Externalities

Abstract:

We study the potential of cooperation in global emission abatements with multiple externalities. Using a two-country model without side-payments, we identify the strategic effects under different timing regimes of cooperation. We obtain a positive complementarity effect of long-term cooperation in abatement on R&D levels that boosts potential benefit of long-term cooperation and a redistributive effect that destabilizes long-term cooperation when countries are asymmetric. We show that whether and what type of cooperation is sustainable, depends crucially on the kind rather than on the magnitude of asymmetries.

Keywords: climate treaty; timing of cooperation; multiple externalities; long-term commitment

JEL classification: D62, F53, H23, Q55

November 2011

Full text in pdf format:
366.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

354

Thomas Duso, Klaus Gugler and Burcin B. Yurtoglu
How Effective is European Merger Control?

Abstract:

This paper applies an intuitive approach based on stock market data to a unique dataset of large concentrations during the period 1990-2002 to assess the effectiveness of European merger control. The basic idea is to relate announcement and decision abnormal returns. Under a set of four maintained assumptions, merger control might be interpreted to be effective if rents accruing due to the increased market power observed around the merger announcement are reversed by the antitrust decision, i.e. if there is a negative relation between announcement and decision abnormal returns. To clearly identify the events’ competitive effects, we explicitly control for the market expectation about the outcome of the merger control procedure and run several robustness checks to assess the role of our maintained assumptions. We find that only outright prohibitions completely reverse the rents measured around a merger’s announcement. On average, remedies seem to be only partially capable of reverting announcement abnormal returns. Yet they seem to be more effective when applied during the first rather than the second investigation phase and in subsamples where our assumptions are more likely to hold. Moreover, the European Commission appears to learn over time.

 

Keywords: Merger Control, Remedies, European Commission, Event Studies
JEL Classification: L4, K21, G34, C2, L2

April 2011

 

Full text in pdf format:
354.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

343

Tomaso Duso, Lars-Hendrik Röller, Jo Seldeslachts
Collusion through Joint R&D: An Empirical Assessment

Abstract:

This paper tests whether upstream  R&D cooperation leads to downstream collusion. We consider an oligopolistic setting where firms enter in research joint ventures (RJVs) to lower production costs or coordinate on collusion in the product market. We show that a sufficient condition for identifying collusive behavior is a decline in the market share of RJV-participating firms, which is also necessary and sufficient for a decrease in consumer welfare. Using information from the US National Cooperation Research Act, we estimate a market share equation correcting for the endogeneity of RJV participation and R&D expenditures. We find robust evidence that large networks between direct competitors – created through firms being members in several RJVs at the same time – are conducive to collusive outcomes in the product market which reduce consumer welfare. By contrast, RJVs among non-competitors are efficiency enhancing.


Keywords: Research Joint Ventures, Innovation, Collusion, NCRA

JEL Classification: K21, L24, L44, D22, O32

November 2010

 

Full text in pdf format:
343.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

338

Erik R. Fasten, Dirk Hofmann
Two-sided Certification: The market for Rating Agencies

Abstract:

Certifiers contribute to the sound functioning of markets by reducing a symmetric information. They, however, have been heavily criticized during the 2008-09 financial crisis. This paper investigates on which side of the market a monopolistic profit-maximizing certifier offers his service. If the seller demands a rating, the certifier announces the product quality publicly, whereas if the buyer requests a rating it remains his private information. The model shows that the certifier offers his service to sellers and buyers to maximize his own profit with a higher share from the sellers. Overall, certifiers increase welfare in specific markets. Revenue shifts due to the financial crisis are also explained.

 

Keywords: Certification, Rating Agencies, Asymmetric Information, Financial Markets.
JEL Classification: G14, G24, L15, D82.

October 2010

 

Full text in pdf format:
338.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

337

Tomaso Duso, Klaus Guglery, Florian Szücs
An Empirical Assessment of the 2004 EU Merger Policy Reform

Abstract:

Based on a database of 326 merger cases scrutinized by the European Commission between 1990 and 2007, we evaluate the economic impact of the change in European merger legislation in 2004. We ?rst propose a general framework to assess merger policy effectiveness, which is based on standard oligopoly theory and makes use of stockmarket reactions as an external assessment of the merger and the merger control decision. We then focus on four different dimensions of effectiveness: 1) legal certainty; 2) frequency and determinants of type I and type II errors; 3) rent-reversion achieved by different merger policy tools; and 4) deterrence of anti-competitive mergers. To infer the economic impact of the merger policy reform, we compare the results of our four tests before and after its introduction. Our results suggest that the policy reform seems to have been only a modest improvement of European merger policy.

 

Keywords: merger control, regulatory reform, EU Commission, event-study

JEL Classification: L4, K21, C13, D78

October 2010

 

Full text in pdf format:
337.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

301

Robert C. Schmidt
Market Share Dynamics in a Model with Search and Word-of-Mouth Communication

Abstract:

This paper analyzes price competition in an infinitely repeated duopoly game. In each period, consumers remember the existence and location of their previous supplier. New information is gathered via search or word-of-mouth communication. Market outcomes are history-dependent, and the Markov perfection refinement is used to narrow the set of equilibria. Firms are shown to use mixed pricing strategies in equilibrium. The resulting price dispersion generates non-trivial market share dynamics. The goal of the paper is to characterize these dynamics, and to reveal the driving forces behind them.

 

Keywords: repeat purchasing, search, customer loyalty, lock-in, mixed pricing

JEL Classification:D43, D83, L11

 

Full text in pdf format:
301.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

300

Robert C. Schmidt
Carbon leakage: Grandfathering as an incentive device to avert relocation

Abstract:

Emission allowances are often distributed for free in an early phase of a cap-and-trade scheme (grandfathering) to reduce adverse effects on the profitability of firms. If the grandfathering scheme is phased out over time, firms may nevertheless relocate to countries with a lower carbon price once the competitive disadvantage of their home industry becomes sufficiently high. We show that this is not necessarily the case. A temporary grandfathering policy can be a sufficient instrument to avert relocation in the long run, even if immediate relocation would be profitable in the absence of grandfathering. A necessary condition for this is that the permit price triggers investments in low-carbon technologies or abatement capital.

 

Keywords: climate policy, emissions trading, grandfathering, leakage, cap-and-trade

JEL Classification: Q55, Q58, L51

 

Full text in pdf format:
300.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

285

Paolo Buccirossi, Lorenzo Ciari, Tomaso Duso, Giancarlo Spagnolo, Cristiana Vitale
Deterrence in Competition Law

Abstract:

This paper provides a comprehensive discussion of the deterrence properties of a competition policy regime. On the basis of  the economic theory of law enforcement we identify several factors that are likely to affect its degree of deterrence: 1) sanctions and damages; 2) financial and human resources; 3) powers during the investigation; 4) quality of the law; 5) independence; and 6) separation of power. We then discuss how to measure deterrence. We review the literature that use surveys to solicit direct information on changes in the behavior of firms due to the threats posed by the enforcement of antitrust rules, and the literature based on the analysis of hard data. We finally argue that the most  challenging task, both theoretically and empirically, is how to distinguish between “good” deterrence and “bad” deterrence.
 

Keywords: Competition Policy, Law Enforcement, Deterrence

JEL Classification: K21, K42, L4

October 2009

 

Full text in pdf format:
285.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

284

Paolo Buccirossi, Lorenzo Ciari, Tomaso Duso, Giancarlo Spagnolo, Cristiana Vitale
Measuring the deterrence properties of competition policy: the Competition Policy Indexes

Abstract:

The aim of this paper is to describe in detail a set of newly developed indicators of the quality of competition policy, Competition Policy Indexes, or CPIs. The CPIs measure the deterrence properties of a competition policy in a jurisdiction, where for competition policy we mean the antitrust legislation, including the merger control provisions, and its enforcement. The CPIs incorporate data on how the key features of a competition policy regime score against a benchmark of generally-agreed best practices and summarise them so as to allow cross-country and cross-time comparisons. The  CPIs have been calculated for a sample of 13 OECD jurisdictions over the period 1995-2005.

 

Keywords: Competition Policy, Indicator, Deterrence, Competition Law

JEL Classification: K21, K42, L40

October 2009

 

Full text in pdf format:
284.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

283

Paolo Buccirossi, Lorenzo Ciari, Tomaso Duso, Giancarlo Spagnolo, Cristiana Vitale
Competition Policy and Productivity Growth: An Empirical Assessment

Abstract:

This paper empirically investigates the effectiveness of competition policy by estimating its impact on Total Factor Productivity (TFP) growth for 22 industries in 12 OECD countries over the period 1995-2005. We find a robust positive and significant effect of competition policy asmeasured by newly created indexes. We provide several arguments and results based on instrumental variables estimators as well as non-linearities to support the claim that the established link can be interpreted in a causal way. At a disaggregated level, the effect on TFP growth is particularly strong for specific aspects of competition policy related to its institutional setup and antitrust activities (rather than merger control). The effect is strengthened by good legal systems, suggesting complementarities between competition policy and the efficiency of law enforcement institutions.

 

Keywords: Competition Policy, Productivity Growth, Institutions, Deterrence, OECD

JEL Classification: L4, K21, O4, C23

October 2009

 

Full text in pdf format:
283.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

267

Susanne Prantl and Alexandra Spitz-Oener
How does entry regulation influence entry into selfemployment and occupational mobility?

Abstract:

We analyze how an entry regulation that imposes a mandatory educational standard affects entry into self-employment and occupational mobility. We exploit the German reunification as a natural experiment and identify regulatory effects by comparing differences between regulated occupations and unregulated occupations in East Germany with the corresponding differences in West Germany after reunification. Consistent with our expectations, we find that entry regulation reduces entry into selfemployment and occupational mobility after reunification more in regulated occupations in East Germany than in West Germany. Our findings are relevant for transition or emerging economies as well as for mature market economies requiring large structural changes after unforeseen economic shocks.

 

Keywords: Entry Regulation, Self-Employment, Occupational Mobility

JEL Classification: J24, J62, K20, L11, L51, M13

July 2009

 

Full text in pdf format:
267.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

240

Jo Seldeslachts, Tomaso Duso, Enrico Pennings (C5)
On the Stability of Research Joint Ventures: Implications for Collusion

Abstract:

Though there is a body of theoretical literature on research joint ventures (RJV) participation facilitating collusion, empirical tests are rare. Even more so, there are few empirical tests on the general theme of collusion. This note tries to fill this gap by assuming a correspondence between the stability of research joint ventures and collusion. By using data from the US Nation Cooperation Research Act, we show that large RJVs in concentrated industries are more stable and hence more suspect to collusion.


Keywords: research joint ventures, product market collusion, empirical test
JEL Classification: L24, L44, L52
March 2008

 

Full text in pdf format:
240.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

239

Joseph Clougherty, Tomaso Duso (C5)
The impact of horizontal mergers on rivals: Gains to being left outside a merger

Abstract:

It is commonly perceived that firms do not want to be outsiders to a merger between competitor firms. We instead argue that it is beneficial to be a non-merging rival firm to a large horizontal merger. Using a sample of mergers with expert-identification of relevant rivals and the event-study methodology, we find rivals generally experience positive abnormal returns at the merger announcement date. Further, we find that the stock reaction of rivals to merger events is not sensitive to merger waves; hence, 'future acquisition probability' does not drive the positive abnormal returns of rivals. We then build a conceptual framework that encompasses the impact of merger events on both merging and rival firms in order to provide a schematic to elicit more information on merger type.


Keywords: rivals, mergers, acquisitions, event-study
JEL Classification: G14, G34, L22, M20
June 2008

 

Full text in pdf format:
239.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

225

Joseph A. Clougherty, Anming Zhang (C5)
Domestic Rivalry and Export Performance: Theory and Evidence from International Airline Markets

Abstract:

The much-studied relationship between domestic rivalry and export performance consists of those supporting a national-champion rationale, and those supporting a rivalry rationale. While the empirical literature generally supports the positive effects of domestic rivalry, the national-champion rationale actually rests on firmer theoretical ground. We address this inconsistency by providing a theoretical framework that illustrates three paths via which domestic rivalry translates into enhanced international exports. Furthermore, empirical tests on the world airline industry elicit the existence of one particular path - an enhanced firm performance effect - that connects domestic rivalry with improved international exports.


JEL Classification: L52, L40, L93
February 2008

 

 

Full text in pdf format:
225.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

221

Tomaso Duso, Enrico Pennings, Jo Seldeslachts (C5)
The Dynamics of Research Joint Ventures: A Panel Data Analysis

Abstract:

The aim of this paper is to test the determinants of Research Joint Ventures’ (RJVs) group dynamics. We look at entry, exit and turbulence in RJVs that have been set up under the US National Cooperative Research Act, which allows for certain antitrust exemptions in order to stimulate firms to cooperate in R&D. Accounting for unobserved project characteristics and controlling for inter-RJV interactions and industry effects, the Tobit panel regressions show the importance of group and time features for an RJV’s evolution. We further identify an average RJV’s long-term equilibrium size and assess its determining factors. Ours is a first attempt to produce robust stylized facts about cooperational short- and long-term dynamics, an important but neglected dimension in research cooperations.

 

Keywords: research joint ventures, dynamics, panel data
JEL Classification: C23, L24, O32
October 2007

 

Full text in pdf format:
221.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

218

Jo Seldeslachts, Joseph A. Clougherty, Pedro Pita Barros (C5)
Remedy for Now but Prohibit for Tomorrow: The Deterrence Effects of Merger Policy Tools

Abstract:

Antitrust policy involves not just the regulation of anti-competitive behavior, but also an important deterrence effect. Neither scholars nor policymakers have fully researched the deterrence effects of merger policy tools, as they have been unable to empirically measure these effects. We consider the ability of different antitrust actions – Prohibitions, Remedies, and Monitorings – to deter firms from engaging in mergers. We employ cross-jurisdiction/pan-time data on merger policy to empirically estimate the impact of antitrust actions on future merger frequencies. We find merger prohibitions to lead to decreased merger notifications in subsequent periods, and remedies to weakly increase future merger notifications: in other words, prohibitions involve a deterrence effect but remedies do not.


JEL Classification: L40, L49, K21
September 2007

 

Full text in pdf format:
218.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

179

Joseph A. Clougherty, Michal Grajek (C5)
The Impact of ISO 9000 Diffusion on Trade and FDI: A New Institutional Analysis

Abstract:

The effects of ISO 9000 diffusion on trade and FDI have gone understudied. We employ panel data reported by OECD nations over the 1995-2002 period to estimate the impact of ISO adoptions on country-pair economic relations. We find ISO diffusion to have no effect in developed nations, but to positively pull FDI (i.e., enhancing inward FDI) and positively push trade (i.e., enhancing exports) in developing nations.


Keywords: FDI, trade, transaction costs, institutions
JEL Classification: C51, F23, L31
November 2006

 

Full text in pdf format:
179.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

178

Susanne Prantl, Matthias Almus, Jürgen Egeln, Dirk Engel (C5)
Bankintermediation bei der Kreditvergabe an junge oder kleine Unternehmen

Abstract:

Loan financing, especially long term bank loan financing, is important for young or small firms in Germany. A large share of all small business lending in Germany originates in public financing programs and cooperative banks, (non-cooperative) private sector credit banks as well as savings banks mediate in the assignment of loans from these programs. Our empirical analyses of this loan type provide insights into the small business loan assignment behavior of the three different bank groups in general. Using various econometric techniques, observation periods and data sources – including detailed data on 6.880 firms – we find three robust, originate results: Not only recently, but already at the beginning of the 1990s credit banks played no substantial, statistically significant role in small business lending. Cooperative and savings banks have, in contrast, a strong, significant positive influence on young, small firms’ loan access. In addition, the loan assignment behavior of the two latter groups is found to be very similar. This is an important result given the ongoing controversial discussion on reforming the German savings bank sector.


Keywords: Kreditvergabeverhalten von Genossenschaftsbanken, Kreditbanken und Sparkassen, Finanzierung junger, kleiner Unternehmen, langfristige Kredite und öffentliche Förderprogramme, Reformierung des deutschen Sparkassensektors
August 2006

 

Full text in pdf format:
178.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

177

Ela Glowicka (C5)
Bailouts in a common market: a strategic approach

Abstract:

Governments in the EU grant Rescue and Restructure Subsidies to bail out ailing firms. In an international asymmetric Cournot duopoly we study effects of such subsidies on market structure and welfare. We adopt a common market setting, where consumers from the two countries form one market. We show that the subsidy is positive also when it fails to prevent the exit. The reason is a strategic effect, which forces the more efficient firm to make additional cost-reducing effort. When the exit is prevented, allocative and productive efficiencies are lower and the only gaining player is the rescued firm.


Keywords: subsidies, asymmetric oligopoly, exit, European Union
JEL Classification: F13, L13, L52
October 2005

 

Full text in pdf format:
177.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

176

Ela Glowicka (C5)
Effectiveness of bailouts in the EU

Abstract:

Governments in the EU frequently bail out firms in distress by granting state aid. I use data from 86 cases during the years 1995-2003 to examine two issues: the effectiveness of bailouts in preventing bankruptcy and the determinants of bailout policy. The results are threefold. First, the estimated discrete-time hazard rate increases during the first four years after the subsidy and drops after that, suggesting that some bailouts only delayed exit instead of preventing it. The number of failing bailouts could be reduced if European control was tougher. Second, governments’ bailout decisions favored state-owned firms, even though state-owned firms did not outperform private ones in the survival chances. Third, subsidy choice is an endogenous variable in the analysis of the hazard rate. Treating it as exogenous underestimates its impact on the bankruptcy probability. Several policy implications of the results are discussed in the paper.

 

Keywords: State aid, European Union, Discrete-time hazard, Bivariate probit
JEL Classification: K2, G3, L5
October 2006

 

Full text in pdf format:
176.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

163

Tomaso Duso, Klaus Gugler, Burcin Yurtoglu (C5)
Is the Event Study Methodology Useful for Merger Analysis? A Comparison of Stock Market and Accounting Data

Abstract:

Using a sample of 167 mergers during the period 1990-2002 involving 544 firms either as merging firms or competitors, we contrast a measure of the merger’s profitability based on event studies with one based on accounting data. We find positive and significant correlations between them when using a long window around the announcement date and, for rivals, in case of anticompetitive mergers.


Keywords: Mergers, Merger Control, Event Studies, Ex-post Evaluation
JEL Classification: L4, K21, G34
September 2006

 

Full text in pdf format:
163.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

153

Tomaso Duso, Klaus Gugler, Burcin Yurtoglu (C5)
How Effective is European Merger Control?

Abstract:

This paper applies a novel methodology to a unique dataset of large concentrations during the period 1990-2002 to assess merger control’s effectiveness. By using data gathered from several sources and employing different evaluation techniques, we analyze the economic effects of the European Commission’s (EC) merger control decisions and distinguish between blockings, clearances with commitments (either behavioral or structural), and outright clearances. We run an event study on merging and rival firms’ stocks to quantify the profitability effects of mergers and merger control decisions. We back up our results and methodology by using alternative measures for the merger’s profitability effects based on balance sheet data and obtain consistent results. Our findings suggest that outright blockings solve the competitive problems generated by the merger. Remedies are not always effective in solving the market power concerns, at least not on average. Nevertheless, both structural (divestitures) and behavioral remedies do help restore effective competition when correctly applied to anticompetitive mergers during the first investigation phase. Yet, they are on the whole ineffective or even detrimental when applied after the second investigation phase. Finally, remedies - especially behavioral ones - seem to constitute a rent transfer from merging firms to rivals when mistakenly applied to pro-competitive mergers.


Keywords: Mergers, Merger Control, Remedies, European Commission, Event Studies, Expost Evaluation
JEL Classification: L4, K21, G34, C2, L2
July 2006

 

Full text in pdf format:
153.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

081

Tomaso Duso, Klaus Gugler, Burcin Yurtoglu (C5)
EU Merger Remedies: A Preliminary Empirical Assessment

Abstract:

Mergers that substantially lessen competition are challenged by antitrust authorities. Instead of blocking anticompetitive transitions straight away, authorities might choose to negotiate with the merging parties and allow the transactions to proceed with modifications that restore or preserve the competition in the involved markets. We study a sample of 167 mergers that were under the European Commission’s scrutiny from 1990 to 2002. We use an event study methodology to identify the potential anticompetitive effects of mergers as well as the remedial provisions on these transactions. Stock market reactions around the day of the merger’s announcement provide information on the first question, whereas the stock market reactions around the commission’s final decision day convey information about the outcome of the bargaining process between the authority and the merging parties. We first classify mergers according to their effects on competition and then we develop hypotheses on the effects that remedies are supposed to achieve depending on the merger’s competitive outcome. We isolate several stylized facts. First, we find that remedies were not always appropriately imposed. Second, the market seems to be able to predict remedies’ effectiveness when applied in phase I. Third, the market also seems able to produce a good prior to phase II’s clearances and prohibitions, but not to remedies. This can be due either to a measurement problem or related to the increased merging firms’ bargaining power during the second phase of the merger review.


Keywords: Merger Control, Remedies, European Commission, Event Studies
JEL Classification: L4, K21, C12, C13
January 2006

 

Full text in pdf format:
81.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

019

Joseph A. Clougherty (C5)
Integrating Industrial Organization and International Business to Explain the Cross-National Domestic Airline Merger Phenomenon

Abstract:

Lecture on the first SFB/TR 15 meeting, Gummersbach, July, 18 - 20, 2004

The domestic airline merger phenomenon of the late 1980s and early 1990s sparked a great deal of Industrial Organization literature; yet, that literature neglected non-US merger activity and the potential for international competitive incentives. Using an International Business perspective to complement a primarily Industrial Organization analysis, I argue that factoring international competitive gains helps explain the domestic airline merger phenomenon. A Cournot model of airline competition illustrates the international incentives behind integrating domestic with international routes and behind acquiring domestic competitors. Further, comprehensive panel data tests also support large domestic networks and actual mergers improving the international competitiveness of airlines.


Keywords: airline-mergers, imperfect-competition, international-determinants
July 2004

 

Full text in pdf format:
19.pdf

Contact Newsletter

 

Tel. +49 228 73 79 31
Fax +49 228 73 68 84