Discussion Papers

C3 - Innovationen in Informationstechnologien und Regulierung von Finanzmärkten

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

158

Camille Cornand, Frank Heinemann (C3)
Optimal Degree of Public Information Dissemination

Abstract:

Financial markets and macroeconomic environments are often characterized by positive externalities. In these environments, transparency may reduce expected welfare from an ex-ante point of view: public announcements serve as a focal point for higher-order beliefs and affect agents’ behaviour more than justified by their informational contents. Some scholars conclude that it might be better to reduce the precision of public signals or entirely withhold information. This paper shows that public information should always be provided with maximum precision, but under certain conditions not to all agents. Restricting the degree of publicity is a better-suited instrument for preventing the negative welfare effects of public announcements than restrictions on their precision are.


Keywords: Transparency, public information, private information, coordination, strategic complementarity
JEL Classification: C73, D82, F31
February 2006

 

Full text in pdf format:
158.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

157

Camille Cornand, Frank Heinemann (C3)
Speculative Attacks with Multiple Sources of Public Information

Abstract:

We propose a speculative attack model in which agents receive multiple public signals. It is characterised by its focus on an informational structure which sets free from the strict separation between public information and private information. Diverse pieces of public information can be taken into account differently by players and are likely to lead to different appreciations ex post. This process defines players’ private value. The main result is to show that equilibrium uniqueness depends on two conditions: (i) signals are sufficiently dispersed (ii) private beliefs about the relative precision of these signals sufficiently differ. We derive economic policy implications of such a result.


Keywords: Speculative attack, Private value game, Multiple equilibria, Public and private information
JEL Classification: F31, D82
January 2005

 

Full text in pdf format:
157.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

156

Frank Heinemann (C3)
Measuring Risk Aversion and the Wealth Effect

Abstract:

Measuring risk aversion is sensitive to assumptions about the wealth in subjects’ utility functions. Data from the same subjects in low- and high-stake lottery decisions allow estimating the wealth in a pre-specified one-parameter utility function simultaneously with risk aversion. This paper first shows how wealth estimates can be identified assuming constant relative risk aversion (CRRA). Using the data from a recent experiment by Holt and Laury (2002), it is shown that most subjects’ behavior is consistent with CRRA at some wealth level. However, for realistic wealth levels most subjects’ behavior implies a decreasing relative risk aversion. An alternative explanation is that subjects do not fully integrate their wealth with income from the experiment. Within-subject data do not allow discriminating between the two hypotheses. Using between-subject data, maximum-likelihood estimates of a hybrid utility function indicate that aggregate behavior can be described by expected utility from income rather than expected utility from final wealth and partial relative risk aversion is increasing in the scale of payoffs.


Keywords: lottery choice, risk aversion, myopic risk aversion
JEL Classification: C81, C91, D81
September 2005

 

Full text in pdf format:
156.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

087

Florian Englmaier, Markus Reisinger (C3)
Information, Coordination, and the Industrialization of Countries

Abstract:

The industrialization process of a country is often plagued by a failure to coordinate investment decisions. Using the Global Games approach we can solve this coordination problem and eliminate the problem of multiple equilibria. We show how appropriate information provision enhances efficiency. We discuss extensions of the model and argue that subsidies may be a property of a signalling equilibrium to overcome credibility problems in information provision. In addition we point out possible problems with overreaction to public information. Furthermore, we suggest a new focus for development policy.


Keywords: Information, Coordination, Industrialization, Development, Global Games, Equilibrium Refinements, Big Push
JEL Classification: C72, C79, D82, F21, O12, O14
February 2006

 

Full text in pdf format:
87.pdf

SFB/TR 15 Discussion Paper No.

006

Frank Heinemann, Rosemarie Nagel, Peter Ockenfels (C3)
Measuring Strategic Uncertainty in Coordination Games

Abstract:

Lecture on the first SFB/TR 15 meeting, Gummersbach, July, 18 - 20, 2004

This paper explores predictability of behavior in coordination games with multiple equilibria. In a laboratory experiment we measure subjects' certainty equivalents for three coordination games and one lottery. Attitudes towards strategic uncertainty in coordination games are related to risk aversion, experience seeking, gender and age. From the distribution of certainty equivalents among participating students we estimate probabilities for successful coordination in a wide range of coordination games. For many games success of coordination is predictable with a reasonable error rate. The best response of a risk neutral player is close to the global-game solution. Comparing choices in coordination games with revealed risk aversion, we estimate subjective probabilities for successful coordination. In games with a low coordination requirement, most subjects underestimate the probability of success. In games with a high coordination requirement, most subjects overestimate this probability. Data indicate that subjects have probabilistic beliefs about success or failure of coordination rather than beliefs about individual behavior of other players.


JEL Classification: C72, C91, D81, D84
May 2004

 

Full text in pdf format:
6.pdf

Contact Newsletter

 

Tel.: (089) 2180 3405
Fax. (089) 2180 3510
mail: sfb-tr15@vwl.lmu.de